U.S. Allies at NATO Focus on Europe    02/12 06:58

   European allies at NATO on Thursday brushed aside concerns that the United 
States has stepped back from its leadership role of the world's biggest 
security organization, leaving them and Canada to do the lion's share of 
defending Europe.

   BRUSSELS (AP) -- European allies at NATO on Thursday brushed aside concerns 
that the United States has stepped back from its leadership role of the world's 
biggest security organization, leaving them and Canada to do the lion's share 
of defending Europe.

   U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend Thursday's gathering of 
defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. His no-show came after 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio skipped the last meeting of NATO foreign 
ministers in December.

   It's rare for members of a U.S. administration to miss a meeting of the 
organization's top decision-making body, the North Atlantic Council, at the 
level of ministers, let alone two meetings in a row. Under Secretary of Defense 
Elbridge Colby was sent in Hegseth's place.

   "Sadly for him, he is missing a good party," Icelandic Foreign Minister 
?orger?ur Katrn Gunnarsdttir told reporters. "Of course, it's always better 
that the ministers attend here, but I would not describe it as a bad signal."

   "I'm not disappointed," German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said. "Each 
of us has a full agenda. And one time the American defense minister is here, 
and one time not, so it's his decision and his duties he has to fulfill."

   How times have changed

   When asked what NATO's purpose was in its infancy in 1949, NATO's first 
secretary-general, the British general and diplomat Lord Hastings Ismay, was 
reputed to have replied: "To keep the Americans in, the Russians out and the 
Germans down."

   Nowadays, Germany is stepping up. After Russia invaded Ukraine four years 
ago, it vowed to spend 100 billion euros ($118 billion) to modernize its armed 
forces in coming years.

   A big part of NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's job is to keep the 
Americans in.

   "They have to take care of the whole world. This is the United States," 
Rutte told reporters before chairing the meeting. "I totally accept it, agree 
with it."

   "They have always consistently pleaded for Europe doing more, Canada doing 
more, taking more care of the defense of NATO territory, of course in 
conjunction with the United States," he said.

   That means more European spending on conventional weapons and defense, while 
the U.S. guarantees NATO's nuclear deterrent.

   But doubts linger, and surprises from the Trump administration cannot be 
ruled out. Allies still wonder whether more U.S. troops will be withdrawn from 
Europe.

   "What for me is the most important is the no-surprise policy that has been 
agreed between the NATO secretary-general and the U.S.," Dutch Defense Minister 
Ruben Brekelmans said.

   Stepping back

   Publicly at least, the Trump administration is doing much less at NATO. A 
year ago, Hegseth warned that America's security priorities lie elsewhere and 
that Europe would have to look after itself, and Ukraine in its battle against 
Russia's full-scale invasion.

   Supplies of U.S. guns and money that were sent to Ukraine by the previous 
administration of President Joe Biden have dried up under Trump. European 
allies and Canada are obliged to buy weapons from the United States to donate 
now.

   Western backers of Ukraine were also meeting at NATO on Thursday to drum up 
more military support. A scheme proudly championed by the Pentagon under Biden, 
the Ukraine Defense Contact Group is now chaired by the U.K. and Germany.

   U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey announced that Britain would provide "an 
extra half a billion pounds ($682 million) in urgent air defense to Ukraine. 
This is Britain being a force for good in the world, building a new deal for 
European security within NATO."

   Sweden also intends to fund the purchase of more American weapons. The 
Netherlands will send more flight simulators to help Ukrainian fighter pilots 
train to fly F-16 jets.

   Arctic Sentry

   The one "deliverable" from Thursday's meeting was the announcement that NATO 
would launch Arctic Sentry, its response to U.S. security concerns in the high 
north, and an attempt to dissuade Trump from trying to seize Greenland.

   It's ostensibly aimed at countering Russian and Chinese activities or 
influence in the Arctic region.

   But Arctic Sentry is essentially a rebranding exercise. National drills 
already underway in the region, like those run by Denmark and Norway, will be 
brought under the NATO umbrella and overseen by the organization's military 
chief.

   It is not a long-term NATO operation or mission.

   Denmark, France, Germany will take part in the "military activities" 
happening under Arctic Sentry, but they have not said in what way. Finland and 
Sweden are likely to get involved. Belgium is considering what role it might 
play.

   It remains unclear what role, if any, the United States will take.

   "It can't just be more from the United States," U.S. Ambassador to NATO 
Matthew Whitaker said ahead of Thursday's meeting. "We need capable allies that 
are ready and strong, that can bring assets to all of these areas of our 
collective security."

   Trump's renewed threats last month to annex Greenland -- a semiautonomous 
territory of NATO ally Denmark -- have deeply shaken the rest of the alliance. 
NATO's primary role is to defend the territory of its 32 member states, not to 
undermine it.

   European allies and Canada hope that Arctic Sentry and ongoing talks between 
the Trump administration, Denmark and Greenland will allow NATO to move on from 
the dispute and focus on Europe's real security priority, Russia's war on 
Ukraine.

   Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken said the Arctic security arrangement 
at least means that "we stop having some food fights over the Atlantic."

   "I think that the Greenland saga was not the best moment of NATO (over) the 
last 76 years," he told reporters. "It was a crisis that was not needed."